Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Breno Rossetto Urvaneja vs Jacob Bradshaw Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Urvaneja vs Bradshaw analysis and find out who is favored!
Breno Rossetto Urvaneja vs Jacob Bradshaw Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Urvaneja 0 - 0 Bradshaw
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Urvaneja has won 46.15% of points on his second serve, while Bradshaw has won 52.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Urvaneja, in recent form, has won 47.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bradshaw has won 52.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.7% and 34.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Urvaneja has saved 39.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bradshaw has saved 62.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Urvaneja has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 11/ 22), with Bradshaw winning 54.67% (W/L 41/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Urvaneja has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 30% (W/L 9/ 21). Bradshaw has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 105/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Urvaneja has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 11/ 22), where as Bradshaw has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.46% of matches (W/L 38/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Urvaneja has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Bradshaw has played against players with an average rank of 129.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Urvaneja has won 14% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bradshaw has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Urvaneja has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bradshaw has converted 47.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
550
Rank
548
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
33% (18-36)
Career Total W/L
60% (109-73)
33% (4-8)
YTD W/L
57% (17-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Breno Rossetto Urvaneja | Jacob Bradshaw |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (4/8) | 57% (17/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 37% (10/17) | 57% (37/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (124/142) | 52% (327/298) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) | 59% (17/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 114 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 19 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:48:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 144.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (174/291) | 61% (1181/1952) |
| 1st Serve W% | 56% (98/174) | 69% (817/1181) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (54/117) | 53% (408/771) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (13/26) | 46% (82/177) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (101/262) | 40% (770/1942) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (4/8) | 67% (16/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (4/12) | 59% (17/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 62% (8/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 89% (18/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 11% (18/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 8% (12/1) |
Breno Rossetto Urvaneja Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Loann Massard
Player
Breno Rossetto Urvaneja
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Breno Rossetto Urvaneja
Player
Imran Sibille
45%
(
38 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Bacaloni
Player
Breno Rossetto Urvaneja
84%
(
66 of
79)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Massimo Giunta
Player
Breno Rossetto Urvaneja
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-7(5) 10-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Jacob Bradshaw Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Mohammad Alkotop
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Max Wiskandt
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Moritz Kudernatsch
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Niklas Schell
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
9
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Ifi
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Dussin
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
106)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(7) 7-6(5) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Edas Butvilas
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
83%
(
19 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Martin Klizan
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Urvaneja Vs Bradshaw Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jacob Bradshaw
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
